‘The federal government may not compel state law enforcement agents to enforce federal regulations. “[T]he Federal Government may neither issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the State’s officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program.” In Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898, 935 (1997), a Montana Sheriff Jay Printz challenged the constitutionality of a federal handgun control scheme that required him and other local law enforcement officers to conduct background checks on prospective handgun buyers, ensuring that no handguns were illegally purchased. In invalidating the law, the Supreme Court stated that Congress cannot require state officers to enforce federal laws. Asserting that it was discovered early on by the framers of the Constitution that “using the states as the instruments of federal governance was both ineffectual and provocative of federal-state conflict,” the Court said that “the Constitution  contemplates that a State’s government will represent and remain accountable to its own citizens.”
- State (and local) governments also have the right to be free from unwanted regulation imposed at the federal level. In New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144, 166 (1992), the Court noted “we have always understood that even where Congress has the authority under the Constitution to pass laws requiring or prohibiting certain acts, it lacks the power directly to compel the States to require or prohibit those acts.”
The states, not the federal government, regulate medical practice and establish standards of medical care.’
And to THAT I SAY why were the local and state so complicit in this horror when they had the option not to be. Now there IS NO EXCUSE and explains why when I attempted to report the insurance fraud in order I not get a second MRI three months ago; as oppose to take it as serious as it was as sook as they looked me up thru began to question ME AND ALL THE FALSE ALLEGATIONS. I held the phone away from my ear . All I could hear was an agitated ‘Why arent you answering?!’ Doing all he could to get me to reveal something or get upset, show that which my confiscated laptop did not as what thru found ok or it instead was a detailed chronically of all that was happening to me. And it as all illegal. On THEIR END. Not Sure what they can do with THAT!